 Occasionally in a pairs session, there comes along a hand, where the top pair of the night meets the top pair of the night, from the opposite direction, and the result is a top / bottom, for each direction. Usually, this will come from declarer finding the best line of offence, rather than the defence making a mistake, and giving up an extra trick or more.
For this hand, everybody playing this hand, ended up in the contract of 1NT by South. For the opening lead, this West chose 3 ♦, though in truth they could have picked 10 ♠. This West's choice, was guided by the thought that, out of the choice of two poor looking suits, there is more chance of the J ♦ getting promoted to be a relevant card, than the ♠ card. And so, the die is cast. Declarer elects to play low from dummy, which forces East into having to play K ♦. East can see that there is no future in playing ♦ suit, and so switches to what looks like dummy's weakness, and plays J ♥, which declarer covers, and West plays the K ♥. For declarer, things are starting to look a whole lot brighter. The ♦ suit is now going to produce two tricks, and the J ♥ lead, confirms in declarer's mind, that the 10 ♥ is in East's hand, and so is finessable. The ♠ suit with it's shortness has not been attacked, so when West cashes the A ♣, and leads another ♦, declarer has made a revised plan of what to do with this hand. Declarer wins in dummy, and leads a small ♣ to Q in declarer's hand, which West wins. This is now the end of the road for the defence. A ♦ return is won in dummy and a small ♥ is then lead to declarer's 9 ♥. The rest of the tricks now are won by declarer ( 2 x ♠, 3 x ♥, 2 x ♦ & 2 x ♣ ) for nine tricks and a top.
Did East / West do anything wrong?
Well, a ♠ lead works out better, as it brings the suit to the forefront & will eventually bring in two tricks, but does West know that? West knows that after dummy goes down, that declarer has 13 HCP's (on average for a 12 - 14 opening), dummy has 10 HCP's, and they have 11 HCP's, giving their partner 5 - 7 HCP's, and having seen the K♦, it is not impossible for their partner to have at least one of the black Q's. Cashing A ♣, stands out as possibly an error. Here, it works out as such, as it removes the killing entry to the West hand, but again, does West know this? It is equally possible that East holds the Q ♣, rather than the Q ♠, in which case, you can have a look to see if your partner gives you any encouragement for this line of play. Perhaps East should not have led the J ♥? But surely, it is always correct to attack the perceived weakness in dummy.
Or perhaps, we should just praise declarer, for a very thoughtful way of making the best of the situation, as it is all unfurled.
Here, this hand was played seven times, with various results from one down to this result of plus two.
|